Bailout 6: Getting an equity infusion

by: admin Sunday, March 8th, 2009

The bank gets bailed out by an equity infusion from a sovereign wealth fund.

Duration : 0:12:2


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , ,

« 9/26: Education and Health, Equity and Gender | Home | Private Equity and Hedge Fund Impact on Financial Crisis: Paulson, Cox and Bernanke »

14 Responses to “Bailout 6: Getting an equity infusion”

delegate21 Said:

Because the SWF …
Because the SWF would then own 80% of the bank, and it’s in their best interest for it to stay afloat, and that requires them paying over the market value for them, instead of just buying more. If they simply bought more shares, they would dilute the share value further, thus losing money etc… (its better off for the bank to have less shares)

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
mark7996 Said:

exactly, and this …
exactly, and this is whats happening in real life right now…doesn’t make sense. they are technically buying way above market value…because co’s can’t sell it privately.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
hotdroper Said:

Why would the SWF …
Why would the SWF pay more then market value? That doesn’t make sense in this example.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
kleineajw Said:

You rock! I am a …
You rock! I am a teacher & I really enjoy your delivery style. Keep up the great work!!

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
o0stonedagain0o Said:

THE FED!!

This …
THE FED!!

This video has the FIRST mention of the
FEDERAL RESERVE in the series.

THE ‘FED’ is the real ‘crucks’ of the PROBLEM!

END the FED NOV 22nd
endthefed(dot)us

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
leetcr Said:

Wow. That last …
Wow. That last part was very interesting. So a foreign investor could buy the majority stock of a failing company. And instantly see an increase in stock price despite the fact that tons of new stock have been created.

I think I can see now why all of these businesses have been gobbling each other up the last couple years.

It still seems counter-intuitive though

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
mrjaywilliams Said:

We’re “Goldman …
We’re “Goldman Brothers” or “Lehman Sachs” lol!

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
expchrist Said:

Khan great job! …
Khan great job! This is far more rewarding than watching TV. Do you have a playlist explaining how you gained your experience and your insight? Why you started doing you tube videos? Are you hiring? Can I submit my resume to you for a job so that I might learn some more first hand?

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
wmacorlando Said:

the loan was due …
the loan was due because corporations often take out loans for a short term like 3 months.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
wmacorlando Said:

it’s a shame that …
it’s a shame that 10,000 people have seen Bailout 1 and only 853 people have seen bailout 6 so far. This just tells me people aren’t as interested in or able to understand this subject as they say they are.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
brco2003 Said:

Sal, why did the …
Sal, why did the company need to pay of Loans A and B (in the previous video)? Could they not have not paid them off and accrued a bit more interest while still holding on to those solid bonds?

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
brco2003 Said:

He doesn’t teach at …
He doesn’t teach at MIT, but he should.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
dallenchao Said:

I DID go to MIT, …
I DID go to MIT, and don’t think it was explained as well there. Great work!

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
pongman Said:

Thanks professor. …
Thanks professor. If I had you as a teacher I’d have gone to MIT lol.

Comment made on March 8th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
 

Leave a Comment